Liberal Bias at the Seattle Times

The Seattle Times has become very biased in it's hard news reporting in the last few years. Michael Fancher, senior v.p., believes the Times is fair and balanced. I document instances of this liberal bias. Primarily, this bias revolves around the discrediting of George Bush and downplaying our war on terror. Thank you for visiting my blog

Monday, July 12, 2004

Close-Up Section: An Accurate Portrait of Bush

I spend an awful lot of time ripping the Seattle Times, so I want to give credit where credit is due. Today's Close-Up section on page A3 (which I have frequently complained is more like an editorial page) features a story about Bush's political evolution and his deep religious faith. Though it's not what I would call a glowing piece, it is certainly accurate and fair. I know many on the left believe Bush's faith and strong moral convictions are a negative trait, and I know for a fact that this is the foundation for much of the hate directed towards Bush. In other words, this piece will likely reinforce the hate many already feel. I, on the other hand, believe Bush's faith is an asset and the source of his strength.

The rest of the paper, however, is business as usual. We get more stories about how Bush's presidency is in trouble because of Iraq. On page A3, the story, "Conservative Republicans express concern over Iraq war" states, "Conservatives, the backbone of Bush's political base are increasingly uneasy about the Iraq conflict and the steady drumbeat of violence in post-war Iraq." It seems to me, the only "drumbeat" is the Seattle Times using bad news in Iraq to attack Bush.

And, of course, we get more Kerry fluff stories like the piece on page A4, "Kerry courting conservative vote". Now that's news, a candidate trying to attract voters from the opposing party. Normally, candidates prefer that members of the opposing party not vote for them.



0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home